Human Evolution & the Chain of Existence

Often I hear that because a life form is small, doesnt speak and eats off of the ground that it is not intelligent and that truly bothers me. I am offended that something that lives, has evolved and survives in the World would be considered not as important - thats silly.

The only difference between one animal and another is its nutrient make up, the availability of certain vitamins and the way that animal has used the vitamins. You are what you eat is truly a fact. The higher vitamin/nutrient content you hold, the higher you will be on the evolutionary scale. The more complex you are, the more you feel, think, develop, evolve.

I have starved in my life and the less I had to eat, the less I was receptive to pain, the less I thought, the less I accomplished.

The more I studied the evolution of animals, genetic make-up, cellular activity the more I realized that Man did not evolve from a monkey.

The first Human Beings were more like a bear, feeding from both vegetable and meat, traveling, tree and land dweller. The very first Human Beings were bear-like and we evolved on our own evolutionary tree, having nothing to do with monkeys. How many monkeys live in caves?? Cro-Magnon lived in caves. Bears live in caves.

Seriously, I am 100 percent convinced that Man did not evolve from monkeys but rather a bear-like creature. I dont believe we will find an ape-like missing link because Man evolved so early on into his current form that the bear-like creature is far, far behind.

I believe that Whales, Dolphins, Bears, Wolves - animals such as these share a common ancestor and that Man is a branch of these animals. It was one of the first on the evolutionary trek to Homo Sapien-ism.

I welcome any challenging ideas that are convincing that Man evolved from a monkey. I have many, many reasons for my ideas on this subject and enjoy the challenge of all ideas.

Its my opinion that the monkey evolved in imitation of early Man, not the other way around.

-Fish